← Back to all agents
Research Freemium
Elicit
Research agent that reads academic papers and extracts findings.
Our take
Indispensable for literature reviews — turns 50 papers into a table.
What it is
Elicit is a research assistant that searches across 200M+ academic papers and uses language models to extract key findings into structured tables. It is designed for empirical research workflows: literature reviews, systematic reviews, and evidence synthesis. You can ask a research question and get back a table of papers with their methods, sample sizes, and conclusions filled in.
Best for
- Literature reviews and systematic reviews
- Extract data from many papers into a comparison table
- Find papers by methodology or outcome (not just keywords)
Pros
- Built specifically for academic research workflows
- Saves hours of manual paper skimming
- Transparent about which papers the answers come from
Cons
- Less useful outside empirical research (CS, biomed, social science)
- Free tier is limited in number of papers per month
Quick start
- Sign up at elicit.com with your email or Google account — free tier gives a limited number of paper analyses per month.
- Type a research question (e.g., "Does meditation reduce anxiety in adults?"). Elicit returns a columnar table of real papers with extracted answers, sample sizes, and methodologies.
- Filter columns by sample size, intervention type, or outcome to drill into the evidence base.
- Click any row to read the source excerpt Elicit used, with the citation pinned to the sentence.
- Plus $12/mo and Pro $49/mo add more analyses per month, larger extracts, and alerts on new papers matching your query.
Sample input / output
Input
Research question: "Does mindfulness-based therapy reduce anxiety symptoms in college students? Show me RCTs from the last 5 years." Output
Returned 18 RCTs as a structured table:
- Hofmann et al. (2018, meta-analysis, n=2,341) — Hedge's g = 0.42, p<.001
- Galante et al. (2021, Lancet Psychiatry, n=6,126) — effect size 0.32
- Zhang et al. (2024, BMC Public Health, n=1,847 students) — g = 0.51
...
Inline excerpts link back to PDF pages. Click "Add to Library" to keep the search for later. 14/18 papers found on PubMed / Semantic Scholar verified. Benchmarks
Indexed papers 200M+ across PubMed, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex
Best fit Literature reviews, systematic reviews, evidence synthesis
Plus tier $12/mo, ~10× the free analyses
Pro tier $49/mo, full-text PDFs, alerts, larger extracts
Pricing
Free tier; Plus $12/mo
Underlying models
Should you pick this?
Pick it if You're writing a literature review or systematic review and need to turn 50+ papers into a structured comparison table — Elicit was literally built for this workflow.
Skip it if Your question is outside empirical research (engineering, CS architecture questions, creative writing) — Consensus or Perplexity serve better there.